I
know there are so many more problems in the world than as-it-happens
news coverage of major natural disasters. But as large swathes of the
East Coast tuned in last Monday for information about Hurricane
Sandy as it slammed into lower Manhattan and wrecked havoc along the
Eastern seaboard I had to ask, aloud … and to a room filled with
husband and dog, (the kids had already gone to bed and were
pretending to be asleep) if it's finally time for major news
organizations such as CNN to get rid of (or at least diminish the
presence of) people reporting live and on-camera from the storm
surge.
I
mean ...
!!!!
Every
time one rain-coated anchor split screens with another rain-coated
reporter who -- screaming against the wind –- was
remarking about how eerily dark the city was or how high the waves
were, I was almost angry.
On
the edge of seething, even.
Houses
on fire. A facade collapse. A hospital generator failure that was
sending workers into the street with premature infants.
And
in my living room a guy was clinging to a road sign and fighting
gusts of wind for the limelight, all the while telling viewers that
no one should be traveling around (like he was). I was slack-jawed as
another reporter -- after I'd switched channels -- recounted how many
injuries his crew had suffered. The result, he said, of blowing signs
and debris -- even though they were "taking precautions"
and being "safe".
The
talking heads inside the relative safety of high-rise studios don't
seem like much of an improvement with their oh-so-helpful banter:
“Please tell that guy to bring his dog inside,” said one anchor
to her storm chaser in Battery Park as a man walking a dog glided
through the shot.
I
shook my head, picturing Triumph, the Insult Comic Dog, delivering
the disagreeable answer: “Yes... I would love to be back inside, on
the hardwood floors, for me to poop on!!!”
I
should learn to let this roll of my back. Like rain.
Arm-chair
quarterbacking. Backseat driving. Why am I complaining?
It's
not as if any of this is scripted. They're all just telling it as
they see it and repeating an earpiece full of Googled facts, hoping
for something new to report. Something -- anything -- that will
shift the dialog to something more substantial.
I
start flipping channels. Clicking screens. Scrolling through the all
the new networks at my disposal.
"What
about the hospitals?"
"What
about the fires?"
"What
about climate change?"
"Why
is CNN wasting time with some guy in front of a casino on a mostly
deserted street?"
"Do
people REALLY want to see this person swept away?"
My
husband just shook his head in abject disagreement with my indignant
frustration … and chuckled:
"I'll
tell you what I want to see. I want to see an alligator from the
sewer swallow him up."
"Or
a shark ... washed in from the river?" I
offered in jest.
"Better
yet."
“I'd
just settle for the rain to stop.”
“No
one likes a quitter.”
1 comment:
Before 24-hour news came along, I remember the news being just that...the news. Now that they have to fill up so much time (and get ratings, too), they're practically gleeful that something bad is happening and they can cover it. I think the people in the field are just a symptom of that. Yech.
Post a Comment