The boy looked up at me with sheepish
hope. His voice was so low I could hardly hear. I asked him to repeat
the words again.
“Mom, will you tell MaryJane Smithdoe
that I want her to look at my painting.”
Hands jammed in his pockets, lips
wrapped over his teeth, he shifted from one foot to the other as he
looked down at the floor.
I still didn't really understand.
He was four at the time, and in
preschool, and in absolute awe of one girl in particular. A
raven-haired beauty whose interest included pigtails, sparkly shoes
and playing Grocery Store with friends.
I knew he was smitten. When he said her
name he seemed to sing it, elongating it with a few extra syllables.
She, of course, didn't know he existed.
Because she was four, too.
Despite my apprehension, and being the
dutiful mother that I am, I walked over to the girl and told her that
my son was hoping she would be so kind as to look at a painting he
made at the easel. (I successfully stopped myself from using the word
etching.)
She agreed and followed me to the art
room of the preschool.
As he stood some distance away,
concealed behind a doorframe, she giggled at the sight of a smiling
sun dripping its yellow tempera rays onto a wobbly tricolor rainbow.
And then she skipped away without another word.
I held my breath. What was he
expecting?
He … was ... ecstatic! She had looked
at his painting. She had smiled. And he never had to speak to her at
all.
I was a little less ecstatic. Not only
did I feel the need to worry that my son might grow up to be a
stalker, I had already proven to be an enabler.
It's harmless, right?
Probably even hereditary.
It wasn't too long ago … during the
awkward 90s … that I thought dating in my mind would be the best
way to have a relationship.
I would pick someone, call him my
“boyfriend,” and then never tell the person we were “going
out.”
It really was perfect. There was no
awkwardness, no arguments, and no worries about what to wear to a
romantic dinner … because there would be no romantic dinners.
But that's beside the point.
The point was that when I decided we
were through as an imaginary couple, the relationship just ended. No
bad feelings.
Oh, how very Lars Lindstrom of me,
right?
Which leads me to my budding
adolescent. Who, it turns out, has independently found my secret to
dating at the ripe old age of 10.
Wait! Back up the truck! Dating? At 10?
I didn't believe it either, so I asked
around. Turns out there is a thriving and intricate web of elementary
school love connections that work like MatchDotCom without the
DotCom.
My fifth-grader explained it to me,
with the proviso that I never divulge names.
Turns out, students at this age spend
an inordinate amount of their free time trying to establish would-be
infatuations.
“If A likes B and C likes D, but A
likes D and F is jealous, you might have a mess on your hands she
explains. It could lead to d-r-a-m-a.”
The more I dug, the more I understood
that “going out” in the eyes of fifth graders is as far away from
the common understanding of the term “dating” as humanly
possible.
“It works like this: Since everyone
is talking about who likes whom, if you tell people who you really
like it can get awkward. Dating, let's face it, is awkward. Anyway,
they find out who likes you and you decided if you like them too and
then you are going out.”
I know …
The explanation doesn't really clear
things up.
“So … What do you do when you 'go
out'?”
“Nothing.”
Well … do you hold hands? Do you pass
notes?”
“Nope. Not at all. In fact, we just
stop talking to each other altogether. It's really easier that way
for everyone.”
It all makes perfect sense to me. After
all, half of the fluid sloshing around in her DNA pool is mine.
No comments:
Post a Comment